Uh, rebel8, I think we're probably talking right past each other here.
This quote from the link you posted confirms my earlier assertion:
"Generally, it is only when the child’s life is at risk that the weighing of interests favors the child and the government authority that is asserting the child’s rights."
Bottom line, if to a "reasonable degree of medical certainty" the kid's going to die without a blood transfusion, the whining JW parents can go pound sand while the ER docs give them blood to save their life. That's the reality in urban, Western, ERs that have access to judges willing to sign off 24/7 to save a kid's life.
If the kid's gonna die, the cult can suck it and the kid's gonna live.
Am I missing something here?
om